你如何通过背景调查？如果背景调查失败会怎样？这两个查询是 有关背景调查的最常见问题之一。不幸的是，它们也是最难以具体和令人满意的方式回答的。 

挑战在于，对于通过背景调查，没有一个公认的定义。一个雇主可以接受的事情将不会为另一个雇主所接受。对于一份工作来说可能是好的，对于不同的职位可能会破坏交易。这些差异给任何关于背景调查的对话带来了复杂性。 

通常，未通过背景调查意味着您的背景不符合雇主的标准。这可能意味着您过去曾有过刑事定罪，这会质疑您履行工作职责的能力。例如，如果您有两次酒后驾车的记录，您将无法通过任何涉及操作车辆的工作的背景调查。如果您的雇主进行工作或教育背景调查并发现您在简历上撒谎，您也可能无法通过背景调查。在这两种情况下，未通过背景调查可能会使您失去工作考虑的资格。 

如果背景调查报告显示有刑事定罪，则认为某人未通过背景调查是一种相对普遍的看法。这种看待事物的方式过于简单化，因为它没有考虑雇主的决策过程。 

有些信念要求雇主取消求职者的资格。例如，学校不允许雇用注册的性犯罪者。对于不太严重的犯罪，事情就没有那么简单了。假设有轻微盗窃和毒品犯罪记录的人申请工作。当雇主进行背景调查时，这些定罪会显示在报告中。但是，雇主最终可能会决定这些定罪与手头的职位无关，并无论如何都会雇用该人。在这种情况下，即使候选人没有无犯罪记录，他们也通过了背景调查。 

求职者问“如果你没有通过背景调查会怎么样？” 或“我怎样才能通过背景调查？” 而不是让他们批判性地思考自己的背景。 

如果您的记录中有刑事定罪，请考虑雇主如何看待您的这些历史记录。鉴于您的特定犯罪记录，您是否比其他人不太可能竞争某些工作？ 评估您自己的背景 可以帮助您对所从事的工作更具战略意义。

the most frequently asked questions about background checks. Unfortunately, they are also among the most difficult to answer in a concrete and satisfactory way. 

The challenge lies in the fact that there is no one agreed-upon definition for passing a background check. What might be acceptable to one employer will not be acceptable to another. What might be fine for one job might be a deal-breaker for a different position. These differences bring complexity to any conversation about background checks. 

Generally, failing a background check means that your background falls short of an employer’s standards. That might mean you have a criminal conviction in your past that calls into question your ability to perform the responsibilities of the job. For instance, if you have two DUIs on your record, you will fail the background check for any job that involves operating a vehicle. You may also fail a background check if your employer runs work or education verification background checks and finds out that you lied on your resume. In either of these contexts, failing the background check would likely disqualify you from job consideration. 

It is a relatively common belief that someone has failed a background screening if the background check report shows a criminal conviction. This way of looking at things is an oversimplification because it doesn’t consider the employer’s decision-making process. 

There are convictions that require an employer to disqualify a job candidate. Schools, for example, are not allowed to hire registered sex offenders. For less severe crimes, things aren’t so simple. Say someone with petty theft and drug convictions on their record applies for a job. When the employer runs a background check, these convictions show up on the report. However, the employer ultimately may decide that the convictions are not relevant to the position at hand and hire the person, anyway. In this case, the candidate has passed the background check even though they do not have a clean criminal record. 

It’s less constructive for job seekers to ask, “What happens if you fail a background checks?” or “How can I pass background checks?” than it is for them to think critically about their own backgrounds. 

If you have criminal convictions on your record, think about how employers may see those pieces of your history. Are there certain jobs that you are less likely to compete for than others, given your specific criminal record? Assessing your own background can help you be more strategic about the jobs that you pursue.