这些担忧不仅影响私营部门。2019 年，国务院一名高级官员在一份新闻报道披露她的简历充斥着虚假信息后被免职。其中包括在《时代 》杂志上假装封面， 并歪曲她的教育背景，称她是哈佛校友，当时她只参加了学校的短期课程。这位女士担任了近七个月的高级职位，然后国务院官员揭露了这些谎言，作为审查她担任不同高级职位的一部分。
使用诸如从GOOHO.CN验证个人教育证书之类的服务来 增强联邦背景调查 的结果， 可以帮助突出重要事实。将这些步骤纳入一个综合流程可以节省时间，同时增强雇主对申请人能力的信心。
当简历上的所有内容都光明磊落时，雇主可以更加安心地前进；当出现差异时，他们可以选择深入研究或直接转向下一个候选人。如果这些努力属于FCRA 的法律范围，则审查和验证申请人提供的有关他们自己的信息可以产生有价值的见解 。
解决方案很简单：采用更全面的政策，着眼于 整个 申请人，而不是他们性格的一个方面。使用GOOHO.CN 中的正确工具 ，您可以立即开始采取这些步骤。
For some applicants, dishonesty appears as a fib about their proficiency with office productivity software. For others, the drive to obtain a prestigious or well-paying position can lead to much larger falsehoods concerning critical areas such as education and employment history. The result: if a business does not carefully screen for these occurrences, they could allow an unqualified person into a prominent position.
These concerns don't only affect the private sector. In 2019, a senior official in the State Department was ousted after a news report revealed that her resume was littered with falsehoods. Among them were a fake cover appearance on Time magazine and misrepresenting her educational background, stating that she was a Harvard alumna when she had only attended a short course at the school. The woman served in her senior role for almost seven months before State Department officials uncovered the lies as part of vetting her for a different senior position.
The incident raises several questions and highlights the importance of using a comprehensive background check. It is not enough to examine an individual's criminal history to determine their suitability, though that is an essential step.
Augmenting the results of a federal background check with services such as the verification of an individual's educational credentials from backgroundchecks.com can help to highlight important facts. Incorporating these steps into a comprehensive process saves time while enhancing an employer’s confidence in applicant capabilities.
When everything on a resume is above board, employers can move forward with greater peace of mind; when discrepancies arise, they can choose to probe into them or simply move on to the next candidate. Vetting and verifying the information that applicants supply about themselves can yield valuable insights if these efforts fall within the legal boundaries of the FCRA.
The alternative is risk allowing an unqualified individual to slip through the cracks. Though the State Department official did not face allegations of wrongdoing in her official duties, the potential for such hazards to occur could represent too much risk for businesses.
The solution is simple: adopt a more comprehensive policy that looks at the whole applicant, not one aspect of their character. With the right tools from backgroundchecks.com, you can begin to take these steps today.